RSU Cost Basis showing up as 0 on 8949
I know the RSU question gets answered a lot, especially by TomYoung, but one thing I'm still confused by:
I followed the "I sold RSUs" workflow and input all the necessary data, which I have and is accurate. (# of shares that vested, price at vest date, number of shares withheld for taxes, number of shares sold, sale price) . On form 8949 for those RSU sales the cost basis on column e is 0. Schwab DOES report a cost basis, and it's not zero.
I'm focusing on this because I'm also having my taxes done by a CPA this year and he came up with different numbers just using the 1099-B from Schwab and it's leading to TT showing me owing less taxes than the CPA does. I think it's due to how he's computing the cost basis (using the Schwab value) and I need to understand which is correct, because saying "Well, this is how TT does it" is likely to go poorly.