Skip to main content
June 29, 2021
Question

Should I form an LLC for investments or remain individual investor?

  • June 29, 2021
  • 4 replies
  • 0 views

I am going to have farm equipment assets located out of state that will be generating rental income payable from a payer in another state.  The equipment will be purchased new.  It is a passive investment and I will receive a 1099-MISC for rents paid.  The payer has suggested that I may want to look into forming an LLC for the investments in order to take advantage of write-offs and deductions, particularly Section 179 and equipment depreciation.   I've read that Section 179 deductions can only be taken off "active" income from an LLC.  Since this is a passive investment, would this be worthwhile to form an LLC?  What additional deductions/savings/protections will I benefit from having an LLC versus just being an individual investor?  Without the LLC, can I still write off depreciation of the equipment?  Thanks for your help.

4 replies

M-MTax
June 29, 2021

For starters, you would be in the same position with a single member LLC as you would being an individual investor.....there is no difference because single member LLCs are disregarded for federal tax purposes.

Carl11_2
Employee
June 29, 2021

If you would be the sole owner of the LLC, then it offers no real advantage. In fact, even a multi-member LLC would not offer any real advantage if the only assets the LLC will have are those used to generate passive income; and rental income is passive.

If that's the only reason for this, then forming an LLC has nothing to offer you. Stay away from that and just report your rental income/expneses on SCH E as a part of your personal 1040 tax return. Even if you do form an LLC, all the income is still passive and still ends up reported on SCH E as a part of your 1040 return. All that does is just create another layer of paperwork and accounting that provides no benefit and serves no real purpose.

 

M-MTax
June 29, 2021

Even if you do form an LLC, all the income is still passive and still ends up reported on SCH E 

Not at all true......... @sidekickin said the rental was farm equipment which is not real estate.

Personal property.

Do not use Schedule E to report income and expenses from the rental of personal property, such as equipment or vehicles. Instead, use Schedule C if you are in the business of renting personal property.

June 29, 2021

Even if the requirements explained earlier under What Property Qualifies? are met, you cannot elect the section 179 deduction for the following property.
• Certain property you lease to others (if you are a non-corporate lessor). THAT'S YOU. HOWEVER THERE IS AN EXCEPTION 
Generally, you cannot claim a section 179 deduction based on the cost of property you lease to someone else. This rule does not apply to corporations. However, you can claim a section 179 deduction for the cost of the following property.
1. Property you manufacture or produce and lease to others.
2. Property you purchase and lease to others if both the following tests are met.
a. The term of the lease (including options to renew) is less than 50% of the property's class life.
b. For the first 12 months after the property is transferred to the lessee, the total business deductions you are allowed on the property (other than rents and reimbursed amounts) are more than 15% of the rental income from the property.

179 is limited to business income so if the 179 deduction would result in a business loss the "loss" amount isn't deductible but must be carryforward.

 

having pointed those things out about section 179, there is another possibility that is not subject to the same constraints as 179. That's bonus depreciation under IRC 168(k)

you should read IRS PUB 946 starting on page 23

HTTPs://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-publication-946 

 

 

sometimes taking the maximum depreciation in the 1st year is not the best from a tax standpoint.  your income goes way down that year but then you have no depreciation deductions in future years to offset the income which usually results in paying more taxes in subsequent years than you saved in the 1st year

Carl11_2
Employee
June 29, 2021

sometimes taking the maximum depreciation in the 1st year is not the best from a tax standpoint. your income goes way down that year but then you have no depreciation deductions in future years to offset the income which usually results in paying more taxes in subsequent years than you saved in the 1st year

I see and hear about that quite a bit. Mostly from those who wished they hadn't done that when it comes to things dealing with rental real estate.

 

June 30, 2021

Thanks for all the feedback.  It sounds like if all I have is passive income from investments that there is really no point in forming an LLC since I cannot use the Section 179 deduction.  However, with respect to writing off depreciation on the asset as an individual, if at a later time the asset is sold for the same price as I purchased it for, will I owe back the depreciated amounts I took over the years?

Carl11_2
Employee
June 30, 2021

if at a later time the asset is sold for the same price as I purchased it for, will I owe back the depreciated amounts I took over the years?

Yes. A common mistake I see folks make, is thinking that depreciation is a permanent deduction. It's not. When you sell or otherwise dispose of the asset you must recapture all depreciation taken. If you don't depreciate the asset, then you must recapture the depreciation you should have taken, anyway. It's a lose-lose situation. Two things about recaptured depreciation.

1) The recaptured amount is included in your AGI.

2) Recaptured depreciation is taxed anywhere from 0% to a maximum of 25%. Even if your AGI puts you in a higher tax bracket, the recaptured depreciation will not be taxed higher than 25%.

 

M-MTax
June 30, 2021

A common mistake I see folks make, is thinking that depreciation is a permanent deduction. It's not.

You're right......it's NOT a permanent deduction....it's a cost recovery system

You're also thinking about it wrongly because you're fixated on depreciation deductions for real estate which almost always goes up in value over time. You need to consider personal property which almost always goes DOWN in value over time. If you buy office furniture for a suite of offices for your business you'd depreciate the furniture over 7 years BUT you'd be hard pressed to find someone to pay more than a paltry sum if you tried to sell the stuff after that amount of use. So your "recapture" would be next to nothing.